![]() V-Ray 5 is another benchmark testing 3D performance in vsamples. In classroom, we also see the Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 5% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X for 3D modeling. In junkshop, we see the same, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. The 7950X is 4% faster than the Ryzen 9 7590X3D for modeling the monster scene in Blender. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 272.8 samples per minute, which is 4% slower than the Ryzen 9 7590X. ![]() Take note, the Blender Open Data Benchmark has changed, it now runs 3 scenes and spits out a “Samples per Minute” number, where higher samples are better.īlender utilizes all the cores to render 3D models, and this once again shows that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. This backups the 3DMark and Geekbench testing as well were both CPUs are the same in single-thread performance. Here the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X, or basically the same performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X is 6% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D when all the cores are maxed out in performance, meaning the 7950X is faster.īut, in single-thread performance the tables even out between the CPUs. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 36268, which is 6% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X at 38605. ![]() In Cinebench R23, the rendering performance backs up the system testing in 3DMark and Geekbench as it relates to multi-core performance. We will now take a look at how rendering performance compares. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |